Harlem rezoning critics want changes
Critics plan to call for several changes to the proposed rezoning of 125th Street at a City Council committee meeting Tuesday, including lowering the income restrictions for new affordable housing, which they say will be too expensive for Harlem residents.
The powerful Land Use subcommittee on zoning and franchises is slated to vote Tuesday on modifying the plan, which would allow developers to build luxury apartment buildings and office towers on Harlem's main commercial strip, anchored by retail, arts and entertainment venues.
City Council Member Inez Dickens, who represents central Harlem, has been in talks with City Planning Department officials over several potential changes, which also include creating a small business development fund and setting aside space for businesses facing eviction.
"The expectation is that is all going to be placed on the table," said Geneva Bain, district manager of Community Board 10, which represents central Harlem.
Rezoning critics, including subcommittee chairman Tony Avella, charge that most Harlem residents make less than $35,000 per family and would miss out on the new developments' affordable housing, which would be reserved for families that earn up to $56,000. They argue that the income restrictions would attract residents from outside of Harlem, while most local families would continue to be priced out the neighborhood.
Seth Donlin, spokesman for the city Department of Housing Preservation and Development, counters that the affordable housing will be awarded through a lottery system and that 50 percent of the units will be aside for local residents.
The City Planning Commission in March voted 11-2 to approve the plan. Earlier this month, more than 100 Harlem residents and small business owners testified against the plan in a raucous hearing before Avella's subcommittee.
The plan uses inclusionary zoning, which provides density bonuses that allow developers to build market-rate condominiums and rental buildings if they set aside affordable housing units.
Avella says that low-income residents have been priced out of neighborhoods like Greenpoint and Williamsburg because the family income caps on affordable units were so high that only middle-class residents from other parts of the city could afford them.
Dickens testified earlier this month that the affordable units should target families with an income of $30,000 or less. She also backed a proposal to reserve space for small businesses that the 125th Street Business Improvement District supports.
Mark Alexander, CEO of the Urban Builders Collaborative, said that while he understands the critics' concerns, the plan is necessary to stimulate new development in Harlem.
Alexander, whose firm is collaborating with Jonathan Rose Cos. on a mixed-income development called Kingsgate House on 124th Street and Second Avenue, said the city Planning Department has "bent over backwards" to make sure the rezoning plan is balanced and takes community concerns into account.
The full City Council is expected to vote on the rezoning plan by the end of April.

irrelevant or repetitive, as well as inappropriate comments about anyone's personal appearance.
The Real Deal does not endorse any comments posted on its Web site.
Comments
Anonymous
The $56,000 annual income for affordable housing is a MAXIMUM cap, not a minimum. Why should it be lowered to $30,000????? Absurd.
Comment #1 Posted By: Anonymous 04/14/08
dePaul Consiglio
In my own opinion,as much as I love about Harlem,
the residents and community boards, should get to gether and decide where exactly are the boundaries of Harlem. And then, the Civic Asoc., should apply to the US Postal Authority in NYC for a special postal zone designating the Harlem zip code/codes as
Harlem,N.Y.
Yo Go Harlem,N.Y.
dePaul Consiglio
Comment #2 Posted By: dePaul Consiglio 04/14/08
Anonymous
No offense but why should a family making less than $35,000 be given the opportunity to own a home???
These people are at or near poverty levels and we should be addressing more important things like food, quality education, safety, etc, and we want them to be a homeowner??? We need to get rid of the attitude of something is owed, like earning what you have has been a forgotten value. Also, what is with the city always pushing the developers and lanlords of the city to handle affordable housing??? Sure, the city gives out tax abatements for new developments, but why make the developer or the landlord eat lost income or lose profit through lotteries and rent stabilization???. Look at the ridiculous amounts of coops in the city that are turning into social clubs that have been known to discriminate and even get away with it (how did this happen!). How about the city just giving tax incentives and credits to those who need it and that's that. The last time I checked, we live in the USA, NYC let alone, the capitalistic city of the world! Ironically, this city gets involved with these social programs that hinder our economic and real estate development. As long as we are a capitalistic society, you can't stop the movement of the market if there's money to be made. Earn your way to make a living or get out of the way!
Comment #3 Posted By: Anonymous 04/15/08
Anonymous
Its true that by lowering the annual income to $30,000, the city is encouraging lazy people who purposely don't want to make more than $30,000 so they can get the low income housing.
Comment #4 Posted By: Anonymous 04/15/08
Anonymous
a family of two making $30,000 a year? I hate to say this but alot of people who apply for this kind of low income housing don't even get it. The people who handle these lottery have someone in mind to reserve these units for. I've been apply for many housing and I don't get the update from them. I don't know who they finally pick. They just collect the applications for the sake of following the government regulation.
Comment #5 Posted By: Anonymous 04/15/08
Anonymous
anonymous #2 how dare you write such smug remarks from the attitude of someone who thinks that he or she "is a cut above" others, you were blessed and so was I to earn more, not everyone earning $30,000.00 is in a situation to earn as much as we are, they stayed through Harlem's transition to a a dangerous place to live and survived until the change only to be pushed out by those who have weathered nothing bad in most cases, " shame on you"
Comment #6 Posted By: Anonymous 07/06/08
Leave a Comment: