CBRE cancels 2009 international conference
CB Richard Ellis canceled its 2009 World Conference, a gathering that has drawn headline speakers such as Al Gore and Colin Powell.
The company cited a poor economy as a reason to halt the event, which in the past has attracted sponsors such as Oxford and BH Properties.
"This was not an easy decision, but one that will relieve our clients, sponsors and exhibitors of a significant expense at a time when the business community faces a challenging economic environment," the company said on its Web site.
There was no conference planned for 2008, but in 2007 former vice president Al Gore was the headline speaker at the gathering in Toronto. The three-day event included a concert by singer Sheryl Crow. The top sponsorship was advertised at $100,000 on the company's Web site.
The 2006 event was held in San Fransisco, with former defense secretary Colin Powell as the headliner. The 2005 conference was held in Las Vegas, where the headline speaker was Herb Meyer, special assistant to the director of Central Intelligence, in the Reagan administration.
The most recent conference attracted several thousand people worldwide from CBRE and other real estate firms such as Jones Lang LaSalle and Bank of America.
Comments
Anonymous
I can't believe they panic like this, they are suppose to be one of the biggest boys. They are suppose to build confidence, but instead they are running and hiding. This is absurd. It doesn't even cost them money to put it together, they charge sponsors for that.
Comment #1 Posted By: Anonymous 08/29/08
Anonymous
So I don't understand. Is CBRE suffering or are their clients suffering? Or both.
Comment #2 Posted By: Anonymous 08/29/08
Anonymous
This is a bad move by CB. They should've sucked it up and had the conference anyways.
Comment #3 Posted By: Anonymous 08/29/08
Anonymous
Cowards!!!!!!
Comment #4 Posted By: Anonymous 08/29/08
Anonymous
that is a loser move. just charge the sponser less. in this environment people need to communicate with each other even more.
Comment #5 Posted By: Anonymous 08/31/08
Anonymous
One of the biggest houses in the business??? Sure. With all the management, leasing, and consulting fees they get, they can't shell out a few dollars for the conference?!
Utterly pathetic.
Comment #6 Posted By: Anonymous 09/02/08
Anonymous
I heard the main reason was because what kind of example would it set if they continued to put on such an extravagant event (and yes it does cost a lot of money to run any event regardless of sponsorship) when they had to downsize? They wanted to show that they're doing their part to save wherever they can instead of having to lay off even more so. I believe this was a smart move... especially on the employee morale part.
Comment #7 Posted By: Anonymous 09/15/08
Anonymous
When companies spend money on company parties and events, people complain.....When companies don't spend money on company parties and events.....people complain?
Comment #8 Posted By: Anonymous 10/08/08
Leave a Comment:
irrelevant or repetitive, as well as inappropriate comments about anyone's personal appearance. The Real Deal
does not endorse any comments posted on its Web site.